The Path

The Path I have a mantra I preach at conferences, where writers are looking to me for advice on making a dollar at this writing thing. The fact is there isnt one path to writing, there isnt one income stream (unless you take a full-time job as a writer), and whatever path youre on will unexpectedly twist, turn and fork. Any assignment, contest, publication credit or gig can alter your direction, giving you options you never imagined. And if youre so set on a given journey you just might overlook opportunity, because sometimes it subtly taps your shoulder as its whisking past. The shrewd writer stays tuned for chances. Others sit back, waiting for opportunity to knock on the door, show its business card, and dump buckets of money at their feet. This business is as much about staying keen and open to opportunity as it is about writing. A contest, even with an entry fee of $25, might give the finalists publication on top of the prize money. That publishing credit might grab the attention of another publication, editor or agent. But if you fear contests, how will you know? Whoosh.there goes opportunity. Your grant application might not achieve the $2,000 you seek, but a panelist judge could remember your name for a different opportunity down the road. The magazine feature you wrote just to put a few bucks in your pocket while you hammer your novel could add several hundred people to your platform, newsletter or Facebook page. As Im fond of preaching, more people read your magazine article in a weekend than will read your book in a year. Your crowdfunding project can open doors to agents and publishers, build platform, and add oomph to your resume as youre pitching for gigs. A speaking engagement can land you three others, freelance writing gigs, an opportunity to sell your books, even acquire more reviews on Amazon that could raise your rankings. All of the funding opportunities out there are easily entangled tangled in a good way. But if you keep seeing your profession as a straight and narrow path to success, youll wake up one day lost, with your missed opportunities in someone elses pocket. Eyes open, people. Study all your writing options. If I hadnt entered contests, my agent would not have signed me. If I hadnt spoken to a small town radio station one cold morning, I would not have landed the three other speaking events, and a request to stock my books in an indie bookstore. You get the picture. The Path The Path The Path-Goal Theory and Leadership Essay Reading 092215 A great deal of research has has been designed to study directive and supportive leadership, but few studies address participative and achievement oriented leadership. The claims of the path-goal theory remain tentative because the research findings to date do not provide s full and consistent picture of the basic assumptions and corollaries of path-goal theory (Evans, 1996; Jermier, 1996, Schriesheim & Neider, 1996). A total of 482 results were retrieved from 120 studies that were found in 103 articles and monograms, dissertations, and unpublished manustripts giving the researchers a total sample sixe of 83,105. An appropriate instrument has yet to be identified that could measure suppportive and achievement-oriented†¦.Previous instruments used varied ..the correleations varied too mush. Thus, moderator analyses were conducted only for studies that used instruments that did not obtain different mean correlations for a given relationship. Clearly, it is unfornuate that a single, appropriate instrument was not identified early and used uniformly for testing path-goal theories. Suggests that future studies should include measurement of the leadership behaviors from different sources than those used for measurement of the dependent variable. The common method variance problem operated for most of the studies. Except for the studies that used the Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) instrument, sugjective measures of both the independent and dependent variable were obtained from subordinated. Even the performance measures were subjectively assessed in all but three of the studies. The lead ership behaviors should involve different sources. Woffard and Criska, 1993). Evans, M. G. (1996). M. G. (1996). R. J. House’s â€Å"A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness.† Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 305-309. Jermier, J. M. (1996). The path-goal theory of leadership: A subtextual analysis.